If flaws are found that require significant training to meet the Army standard during a task assessment, what level of proficiency is indicated?

Significant flaws discovered during a task assessment that necessitate substantial training to reach the Army standard indicate an "Untrained" level of proficiency. This designation is typically applied when an individual or unit lacks the necessary skills or knowledge to perform a task effectively. The indication of needing extensive training suggests that the subject has not yet achieved familiarity or competence in the required tasks, aligning with the characteristics of being untrained.

In contrast, the other classifications imply varying degrees of competence. "Trained" denotes that individuals have received formal instruction and can perform tasks with some level of proficiency. "Practiced" suggests a higher level of familiarity and frequent performance, indicating that tasks are carried out effectively with minimal oversight. "Unsatisfactory" usually refers to performance that does not meet minimum standards but does not necessarily include the implication of requiring extensive retraining. Thus, the identification of a need for significant retraining aligns most closely with the label of "Untrained."